Production Blog Changes From Peer Review FT

 We got all the feedback that we needed and regrouped. My group and I met up and told each other what the criticism that we got back was. Dylan and I found that we both got feedback based upon the volume of the dialogue. Seeing as multiple sources gave us this feedback, we knew we needed to change this. So, we got to work as quickly as we could. Seeing as the voiceovers needed to be heightened in volume, we made sure to use the proper software in order to raise the volume. The task was simple, since all I had to do was raise the decibels that could be heard from the audio. Cap Cut Has a simple feature for this, simply sliding the bar. We replayed the edited project and noticed that it did sound a lot better. Thanks to the feedback that we received, we were able to make our project better. Now it was time to move on to other issues that were brought to our attention. The entire group received an overall critique that the film's brightness was too low. I've mentioned this in the past, and as I said before, I did want to keep it. However, seeing as the entire group was receiving feedback that the brightness was too low, we reached a compromise. We decided to raise the exposure with just a hint, just so that the overall film was brighter. This issue was fairly easy to deal with. Since we edited the entire film as one in the end, we could go back to the settings and play around with the exposure, highlights, shadows, etc. By going back and correcting this mistake, we were able to replay the film and see that it did indeed look better. Thanks to our peers and their critiques, we were able to make our film just a little better. Without those around us, our project would not have been as good as it came out to be, I am glad to have peers around me who are wise enough to give critiques like this!